—-

Amazon |

• Allen, B. (1991). Topic knowledge and online catalog search formulation. Library Quarterly, 61, 188-213.

• Bates, Marcia. 1976. “Rigorous Systembatic Bibliography.” RQ 16 (fall): 2-26.
• Bates, M. (1990). Where should the person stop and information interface state? Information Processing & Management, 26, 575-91.
• Belkin, N. J., R. N. Oddy, and H. M. Brooks. (1982). ASK for information retrieval I & II. Journal of Documentation, 38, 61-71, 145-64.
• Belkin, N. J., S. Chang, T. Downs, T. Saracevic and S. Zhao. (1990). Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs. In Information in the year 2000: from research to applications. Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the American society for information science (69-79). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
• Breeding, Marshall. 2013. “Next-Generation Discover: An Overview of the European Science” In Catalogue 2.0, edited by Sally Chambers. Chicago, IL: ALA, pp. 37-64.
• Brooks, H., P. Daniels, and N. J. Belkin. (1985). Problem descriptions and user models. In Informatics 8 (pp. 191-214). London: Aslib.

—-

• Cool, C., S. Park, N.J. Belkin, J. Koenemann, and K. B. Ng. (1996). Information seeking behavior in new searching environment In P. Ingwersen, and N. O. Pors (eds.). CoLIS 2, Proceedings of the second international conference on conceptions of library and information science: Integration in perspective (403-16). Copenhagen: Royal School of Librarianship.
• Cosijn, E., and P. Ingwersen. (2000). Dimensions of relevance. Information Processing and Management, 26, 533-50.

—-

• Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral approach to information retrieval design. Journal of Documentation, 45(3), 171-212.
• Ellis, D., D. Cox, and K. Hall. (1993). A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 356-69.

—-

• Fidel, R. (1991). Searchers’ selection of search keys: I. The section routine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 490-500.

—-

• Gavin, H. (1998). The essence of cognitive psychology. London: Prentice Hall Europe.

—-

• Hancock-Beaulieu, M. (1990). Evaluating the impact of an online library catalogue in subject searching behavior at the catalogue and at the shelves. Journal of Documentation, 46(4), 318-38.
• Hancock-Beaulieh, M., S. Robertson, and C. Neilson. (1991). Evaluation of online catalogues: eliciting information from the user. Information Processing & Management, 27, 523-32.
• Harman, D. (1996). Overview of the fourth Text Retrieval Conference. In D. Harman (ed.) The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4) (1-24). Washington, DC: GPO.
• Hearst, M., J. Pedersen, P. Pirolli, H. Schutze, G. Grefenstette, and D. Jull. (1996). Xerox site report. Four TREC-4 tracks. In D. Harman (ed.) The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4) (107-20). Washington, DC: GPO.
• Heit, E. (1997). Knowledge and concept learning. In K. Lambers, and D. Shanks (Eds.). Knowledge, Concepts and Catagories (pp. 7-41). Hover: Psychology Press.
• Hsieh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 161-74.

—-

• Ingwersen, P. (1992) Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham.
• Isenberg, D. (1986). Thinking and managing: a verbal protocol analysis of managerial problem solving. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 775-88.

—-

• Kinstler, Till. 2013. “Making Search Work for the Library User.” In Catalogue 2.0, edited by Sally Chambers. Chicago, I: ALA, 17-36.
• Kuhlthau, C. (1993). Seeking meaning. Norwoood, NJ: Ablex.

—-

• Lin, S. J. and N. J. Belkin (2000). Modeling multiple information seeking episodes. In Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the American society for information science (25-38). Medford, NJ: Information Today.

—-

• Oddy, R. N., (1997) Information retrieval through man-machine dialogue. Journal of Documentation, 33(1), 1-14.
• Oddy, R., R. Palmquist, and M. Crawford. (1986). Representation of anomalous states of knowledge in information retrieval. In ASIS ’86: Proceedings of the 49th ASIS Annual Meeting (pp. 248-54). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
• Oddy, R., E. D. Liddy, B. Balakrishnan, A. Bishop, J. Elewononi, and E. Martin. (1992). Towards the use of situational information in information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 48, 123-71.
• O'Neill, Edward T., and Lois Mai Chan. 2003. “FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology): A Simplified LCSH-Based Vocabulary.” World Library and Information Congress: 68th IFLA General Conference and Council. August 1-9, 2003, Berlin, Germany.

—-

• Patel, V., and M. Ramoni. (1997). Cognitive models of directional inference in expert medical reasoning. In P. Feltovich, K. Ford, and R. Hoffman (Eds.). Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 67-99). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
• Pejtersen, A. M. (1989) The “BookHouse”: An icon based database system for fiction retrieval in public libraries. In H. Clausen (ed.) Information and innovation. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference for Informaton and Documentation (165-78). Aarhus: Aarhus University.
• Pettigrew, K. E., R. Fidel, and H. Bruce. (2002). Conceptual frameworks in information behaviors. Annual review of information science and technology, 35, 43-78.

—-

• Roberson, S. (2001) Problem solving. Hove: Psychology Press.

—-

• Shute, S., and P. Smith. (1993). Knowledge-bases search tactics. Information Processing & Management, 29, 29-45.
• Sormunen, E. (2000). A method of measuring wide range performance of Boolean queries in full-text databases. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 748. Doctoral Dissertation. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
• Spink, A., R. Greisdorf, and J. Bateman. (1998). From highly relevant to non-relevant: Examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing & Management, 34, 599-622.

—-

• Tang, R., and P. Solomon. (1998). Toward an understanding of the dynamics of relevance judgment: An analysis of one person’s search behavior. Information Processing & Management, 34, 237-56.

—-

• Vakkari, P. (2000a) Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance: A longitudinal study. Proceedings of the RIAO 2000 Conference (pp. 894-907). Paris: C.I.D. Also available: http://www.info.uta.fi/informaation/vakkari/Vakkari_Tactics_RIA02000.html
• Vakkari, P. (2000b) Relevance and contributory information types of searched documents in task performance. Proceedings of SIGIR2000 Conference, Athens 2000 (pp. 2-9). New York: ACM.
• Vakkari, P., and N. Hakala. (2000). Changes in relevance criteria and problem states in task performance. Journal of Documentation, 56, 540-62.
• Vakkari, P., M. Pennanen, and S. Serola. (2002). Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal. Accepted for publication.

—-

• Wang, P. (1997). User’s information needs at different stages of a research project: A cognitive view. In P. Vakkair, R. Savolainen, and B. Dervin (eds.) Information Seeking in Context (pp. 307-18). London & Los Angeles: Taylor.
• Wildemuth, B., R. de Blieck, C. Friedman, and D. File. (1995). Medical students’ personal knowledge, searching proficiency, and database use in problem solving. Journal of the American Society for information science, 46, 590-607.
• Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-70.
• Wilson, T.D. (2000) Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55.